5 KPIs Every MSP Should Track to Measure Service Desk Performance

You can’t improve what you don’t measure, but measuring the wrong things can be worse than measuring nothing at all. Too many MSPs track service desk metrics that look impressive on dashboards but fail to drive meaningful operational improvements. 

The challenge isn’t collecting data; modern PSA systems capture more information than anyone can reasonably analyze. The challenge is identifying which metrics actually matter for service desk performance and using them to make better decisions. 

This article presents five KPIs that genuinely drive MSP service desk performance, explains why each matters, and shows how to use them, including how automation impacts each metric. 

Why Traditional Metrics Fall Short 

Before examining effective KPIs, it’s worth understanding why common metrics often mislead. 

“Tickets closed” is perhaps the most dangerous metric. It incentivizes closing tickets regardless of whether the underlying issue is resolved, whether the client is satisfied, or whether the resolution is sustainable. A technician who closes 30 tickets daily might be less valuable than one who closes 20 but actually solves problems. 

“Average resolution time” has similar problems. It doesn’t distinguish between a complex issue that warranted three hours of investigation and a simple issue that took three hours due to poor resource allocation. It also incentivizes quick closures over thorough resolutions. 

Effective KPIs avoid these pitfalls by measuring outcomes that directly impact client satisfaction and operational efficiency. 

KPI 1: First-Touch Resolution Rate 

First-touch resolution rate measures the percentage of tickets resolved during the initial technician interaction, without requiring follow-up, escalation, or reassignment. 

This metric matters because every additional touch on a ticket multiplies cost and delays. If a ticket requires three interactions instead of one, you’ve tripled the labor cost and extended the client’s problem duration significantly. High first-touch resolution indicates that tickets are reaching technicians with appropriate skills and information to resolve issues immediately. 

Target benchmarks vary by MSP complexity, but 60-75% first-touch resolution is achievable for well-organized service desks. Below 50% suggests systematic problems with triage, skill matching, or documentation access. 

How automation helps: Automated ticket triage for MSPs improves first-touch resolution by routing tickets to technicians with proven expertise for specific issue types. Guided resolution features provide technicians with relevant context and suggested solutions, reducing the need for escalation or research. 

KPI 2: Mean Time to Triage (MTTT) 

Mean time to triage measures the average duration from ticket creation to assignment to a technician. This metric isolates the triage process itself, separate from resolution. 

Triage time matters because it’s pure delay. During triage, no one is actively working on the client’s problem—it’s just waiting in a queue or being assessed. Extended triage times directly impact client experience and can violate response time SLAs even before resolution work begins. 

For MSPs using manual triage, MTTT often ranges from 15-45 minutes during business hours and can extend to hours during off-peak periods. Automated triage consistently achieves under 60 seconds for the same tickets. 

How automation helps: AI for MSPs eliminates the queue waiting and manual assessment that drives MTTT. Mizo’s platform triages tickets in seconds, ensuring that technicians can begin work immediately rather than waiting for dispatcher availability. 

KPI 3: Dispatch Accuracy Rate 

Dispatch accuracy rate measures the percentage of tickets assigned correctly on the first attempt, meaning no reassignment to a different technician was required. 

Every reassignment represents a failure in the dispatch process. The ticket consumed attention from the wrong technician, the client waited longer than necessary, and the actual resolver starts with cold context. Dispatch inaccuracy compounds other metrics: it increases time-to-resolution, decreases first-touch resolution rates, and frustrates both technicians and clients. 

Manual dispatch typically achieves 75-85% accuracy under good conditions, declining during busy periods or when regular dispatchers are unavailable. Automated dispatch systems targeting 90%+ accuracy represent a significant improvement. 

How automation helps: Intelligent dispatch considers multiple factors: skills, workload, client history, issue type, simultaneously, with complete visibility into information that human dispatchers might lack or forget. Mizo’s dispatch automation learns from outcomes, improving accuracy over time as it identifies which technician-issue combinations succeed. 

KPI 4: Technician Utilization Efficiency 

Technician utilization efficiency measures the percentage of technician time spent on productive work versus administrative tasks, waiting, or context-switching. 

This metric matters because technician time is your primary cost. If technicians spend 20% of their day reading tickets to understand issues, checking queues for new work, or handling tickets outside their expertise, you’re paying for capacity you’re not using. High utilization efficiency means technicians spend their time on resolution work where their skills create value. 

Measuring this requires tracking time across activities, which some PSA systems support directly. Target 75-85% on productive work, recognizing that some time for training, breaks, and team interaction is healthy. 

How automation helps: Automation reduces the non-productive components of technician work. Automatic triage and dispatch eliminate queue monitoring. Guided resolution reduces research time. Well-matched tickets reduce context-switching. Together, these improvements can shift 10-20% of technician time from overhead to productive resolution work. 

KPI 5: Client Satisfaction Correlation with Response Time 

This compound metric examines the relationship between your response times and client satisfaction scores, identifying the threshold where speed impacts client perception. 

Simply tracking client satisfaction (CSAT) isn’t enough because satisfaction is influenced by many factors. Understanding how response time specifically affects satisfaction helps prioritize improvement efforts. For some clients, the difference between 30-minute and 2-hour response might be significant. For others, same-day response is perfectly acceptable. 

Analyze CSAT by response time brackets to identify your specific thresholds. You may find that satisfaction drops sharply after a certain point, indicating your target response time. This insight helps you balance service level investments against client expectations. 

How automation helps: Faster triage and smarter dispatch directly improve response times across the board. Mizo’s automation particularly impacts response time consistency—eliminating the variability that causes some tickets to receive fast attention while others languish. 

Putting KPIs into Practice 

Tracking these five KPIs creates a comprehensive view of service desk health. First-touch resolution shows resolution quality. Mean time to triage shows process efficiency. Dispatch accuracy shows routing effectiveness. Utilization efficiency shows resource optimization. Satisfaction correlation shows client impact. 

Review these metrics weekly to identify trends and monthly to assess improvement initiatives. Use them to evaluate automation investments—the improvements should be visible in multiple KPIs simultaneously. 

Conclusion 

Measuring service desk performance requires metrics that connect operational activities to outcomes that matter. The five KPIs outlined here—first-touch resolution, mean time to triage, dispatch accuracy, utilization efficiency, and satisfaction correlation—provide that connection. 

Each metric reveals specific aspects of service desk function and responds measurably to improvement efforts. Together, they create a framework for understanding where automation and process improvements will deliver the greatest impact. 

Ready to transform your MSP with AI automation?

• Book a Demo - See Mizo in action
• Start Free Trial - Experience AI automation yourself
• Explore Solutions - Learn about our capabilities